warlock16 • PM |
Jul 17, 2009 5:04 AM
|
Non-member
![]() Posts: 38 |
LonelyGirl16 is benned? To pity, she was a grea player for me and verry funny too.But the rules are rules.
|
foibos • PM |
Jul 17, 2009 6:47 AM
|
Foibos
![]() Posts: 551 |
LonelyGirl and Anti TCC rendezvous:
[2009-01-16 01:25:39] - [INSECURE CLIENT] LonelyGirl16 [ - ] IP: - Security ID: 15 using v3369, security state: Secure [2009-01-16 01:25:39] - Found disallowed file(s) 'ddeath.bat' [2009-01-16 01:25:39] - Matching default blacklist wildcard '-' [2009-01-16 01:25:39] - (Please check that there's actually a match, otherwise it's a false positive.) [2009-01-16 01:25:39] - [INSECURE CLIENT] LonelyGirl16 [ - ] IP: - Security ID: 15 using v3369, security state: AntiTCCSecurity [2009-01-16 01:25:39] - Found disallowed file(s) 'dd-autobinder.ini' [2009-01-16 01:25:39] - Matching default blacklist wildcard '-' [2009-01-16 01:25:39] - (Please check that there's actually a match, otherwise it's a false positive.)
Last edited by: foibos Jul 17, 2009 6:51 AM
|
warlock16 • PM |
Jul 17, 2009 7:18 AM
|
Non-member
![]() Posts: 38 |
foibos but are u sure that AntiTCCSecurity program can find all cheating program? Or it limited like an antivirus for example, who is sooner or later defeated by viruses?
|
foibos • PM |
Jul 17, 2009 7:41 AM
|
Foibos
![]() Posts: 551 |
Anti TCC is thanks to our server still in development (news here or here). Wormbo decided not to touch it anymore before few years, but we needed it. It's able do detect all the oldschool cheats and partially block the newest. I'm considering to load another security mutator to catch the bad guys with latest stuff.
Last edited by: foibos Jul 17, 2009 7:55 AM
|
pegasus_ • PM |
Jul 17, 2009 7:54 AM
|
Non-member
![]() Posts: 234 |
Won't that run the risk of consuming more server resources and adding more lag though? Also, since the upload of pictures isn't done to techcom's domain itself but someplace else, what if a cheater simply configures their firewall to block upstream to X-ray's servers?
|
huntdown • PM |
Jul 17, 2009 7:58 AM
|
HuntDown
![]() Posts: 247 |
for kicking someone off the game, is needed the 51% of the votants? i think is too much. if we are 20 players and someone is verry annoying, willing only to piss off the players, we will never be albe to kick him. 50% of the players is too much. i think maybe 50% of them don't even know how to place a kick-vote!! you must reconsider the percentage. we will never kick someone who don't deserve it. but we have no power with the 51%. lets say maybe 25% or so. or even 15%.
sry, did it! this one can be erased. sry again.
Last edited by: huntdown Jul 17, 2009 8:14 AM
|
foibos • PM |
Jul 17, 2009 8:06 AM
|
Foibos
![]() Posts: 551 |
There is another screenshot catcher and some clan manager (related to incident that happened yesterday), but I know nothing about them.
Hunt, it's offtopic. Create new thread for that in Server subforum if you want.
Last edited by: foibos Jul 17, 2009 8:12 AM
|
pegasus_ • PM |
Jul 17, 2009 9:29 AM
|
Non-member
![]() Posts: 234 |
Since you mentioned yesterday's events and this is the thread about bans and kicks, I think it's time this was asked...
What is the server's "official" policy on persistent griefing and team sabotaging, pursuing vendettas against other players and/or nick stealing? All those things can't be caught by any filter and, like Hunt mentioned, players have no practical hope of defending themselves against such bevariours through votekicking. |
crusha_k_rool • PM |
Jul 18, 2009 3:15 AM
|
[GSPB]Crusha
![]() Posts: 926 |
Yesterday there was a player named HeavyZILLA spamming the chat. Check the log.
We tried to kick-vote him and got about 8 votes or more, I think, but had no chance. ![]() |
foibos • PM |
Jul 18, 2009 9:01 AM
|
Foibos
![]() Posts: 551 |
He was annoying, I see, but more annoying was imo FunnyName with his popular idiots team and Xerxes with shit team messages.
|