i suggest to make it a 20 slot, to reduce the lagg.

i agree plus we normally dont have more then twenty so not worth it. btw does it cost us more to run a 32 person server than the twenty?

yes it does cost much more.. I dont get lags even with 26 players...

We definatly don't need 32 ppl server. I don't really lag with 26 either. Idc as long as its not 32.

20 is very good, and it will save money for our clan

Money isnt a problem, we pay extra US10 for High Performance Central Processing Unit, we have downsized to 26 the slots from 32, i have noticed that most of servers let hackers play in their servers, we will stick to our principles of honor and do not allow banned accounts to play on our server...

Voodoo, money is a problem.

If some of our great founders will leave the clan?, then were screwed.

and 20 its enough, we dont need more than 20!..

biggest clans fall a part for money problems,.

In aR^ clan,PapaBEAR was the founder and 1 day he stopped founding, and this clan died,.

it can happen to every1, so i say 20 is enough, 1. less lags.

2.it saves money for our great founders,.

3. it makes it more fair for the founders, they wont have to pay that much and they will also enjoy the game without lags .

agreed with as8man we can support a 20 person server better and longer but if u wish to continue the cost of the 26 its not us that need to make that decision final